Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Audrey LEVY, Respondent,
v.
SEAVIEW TOWERS, INC., et al., Appellants.
June 7, 1976.
 In an action to establish plaintiff's ownership of realty by adverse 
possession, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, after nonjury trial, 
granted judgment to the plaintiff.  The defendant appealed.  The Supreme Court, 
Appellate Division, held that evidence was sufficient to establish plaintiff's 
ownership by adverse possession.
 Affirmed insofar as appealed from.
West Headnotes
Adverse Possession  114(1)
20k114(1) Most Cited Cases
Evidence was sufficient to establish plaintiff's ownership of realty by adverse 
possession.
 **470 Dreyer & Traub, New York City (Harry Reiss, Brooklyn, and Samuel 
Kirschenbaum, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
 Lapp, Schacher & Bradie, Cedarhurst (Michael Bradie, Cedarhurst, of counsel), 
for respondent.
 Before LATHAM, Acting P.J., and MARGETT, DAMIANI, RABIN and SHAPIRO, JJ.
 MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
 *624 In an action Inter alia to establish plaintiff's ownership of certain 
realty by adverse possession, defendants appeal from so much of a judgment of 
the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 7, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, 
granted judgment to plaintiff declaring her to be vested with an **471 absolute 
title in fee simple to the subject realty.
 Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
 In our view, plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence before the trier of the 
facts to substantiate her claim, by adverse possession, to the subject realty.
384 N.Y.S.2d 470, 53 A.D.2d 624
END OF DOCUMENT
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Audrey LEVY, Respondent,v.SEAVIEW TOWERS, INC., et al., Appellants.

June 7, 1976.

 In an action to establish plaintiff's ownership of realty by adverse possession, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, after nonjury trial, granted judgment to the plaintiff.  The defendant appealed.  The Supreme Court, Appellate Division, held that evidence was sufficient to establish plaintiff's ownership by adverse possession.
 Affirmed insofar as appealed from.

West Headnotes
Adverse Possession  114(1)20k114(1) Most Cited Cases
Evidence was sufficient to establish plaintiff's ownership of realty by adverse possession. **470 Dreyer & Traub, New York City (Harry Reiss, Brooklyn, and Samuel Kirschenbaum, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
 Lapp, Schacher & Bradie, Cedarhurst (Michael Bradie, Cedarhurst, of counsel), for respondent.

 Before LATHAM, Acting P.J., and MARGETT, DAMIANI, RABIN and SHAPIRO, JJ.

 MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
 *624 In an action Inter alia to establish plaintiff's ownership of certain realty by adverse possession, defendants appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 7, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, granted judgment to plaintiff declaring her to be vested with an **471 absolute title in fee simple to the subject realty.
 Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
 In our view, plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence before the trier of the facts to substantiate her claim, by adverse possession, to the subject realty.
384 N.Y.S.2d 470, 53 A.D.2d 624
END OF DOCUMENT