UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------X
In the Matter of				Chapter 7
                 	   			Case No. 803-85912-478
MICHAEL BOYLE,
                                        	ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Debtor.             				TO HOLD DEBTOR IN
----------------------------------------X      	CONTEMPT

UPON the annexed affirmation of Kenneth Kirschenbaum, dated January 15, 
2004, and all prior proceedings, it is
ORDERED, that the debtor, Michael Boyle appear and show cause before 
Bankruptcy Judge Dorothy Eisenberg, at the United States Bankruptcy Courthouse, 
290 Federal Plaza, Room 760, Central Islip, New York, on the ____ day of January, 
2004, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the parties can be heard, why an Order 
should not be made and entered:
(a) pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 9020 and 9014 finding the debtor to be in civil 
contempt of court for failing to comply with this Court's order dated December 10, 2003,
(b) directing the United States Marshal to produce the debtor before the Court 
during the Court's regular business hours;
(c) authorizing and directing the United States Marshal to take all necessary 
steps to remove the debtor and other occupants and all of the debtor's property from 
the Premises commonly known as 45 Frank Street, Valley Stream, New York;
(d) authorizing and directing the United States Marshal to incur any necessary 
expense to remove the debtor and any other occupants and all of the debtor's exempt 
property from the Premises, to secure said Premises, and to charge said expenses as a 
claim against the Estate;


(e) fixing the monthly use and occupation expense which the debtor is required 
to pay to the trustee, effective as of the date of filing through and including the date he 
vacates or is removed from the premises, and applying the debtor's homestead 
exemption if not otherwise paid;
(f) pursuant to 11 U.S.C Section 105(a), directing such action against the debtor 
as may be necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement this Court's Order dated 
December 10, 2003, so as to prevent an abuse of process by the debtor; and
(g) for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and it is 
further
ORDERED, that service of this Order and the papers upon which it was granted 
by first class mail upon Michael Boyle, at 45 Frank Street, Valley Stream, NY 11580, 
the United States Marshal's Office, Long Island Federal Courthouse, 310 Federal 
Plaza, Central Islip, New York 11722 and the United States Trustee, Long Island 
Federal Courthouse, 560 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York 11722 on or before the 
____ day of January 2004, shall be deemed good and sufficient service; and it is 
further
ORDERED, that written opposition to the relief sought herein, if any, shall be 
filed with the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court, Long Island Federal Courthouse, 290 
Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York 11722 together with a copy marked for 
Chambers, and served upon Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum, P.C., 200 Garden City 
Plaza, Garden City, New York, 11530 so as to actually be received on or before 
January    , 2004.
Dated: Central Islip, New York	
 January  , 2004		     
                                                                           
HONORABLE DOROTHY EISENBERG
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE












UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------X
In the Matter of
Chapter 7
MICHAEL J. BOYLE,				Case No.  803-85912-478

Debtor.			AFFIRMATION		
------------------------------------------------------------X

Kenneth Kirschenbaum, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the courts 
of the State of New York and before this Court, affirms the following to be true under 
penalty of perjury:
1.  I am the duly appointed and acting Trustee herein and a member of 
KIRSCHENBAUM & KIRSCHENBAUM, P.C.,   I am fully familiar with the facts and 
circumstances set forth in this affirmation.
2.  This court issued an order dated December 10, 2003, directing the debtor to 
file schedules by December 31, 2003 and to appear at his Bankruptcy Code Section 
341(a) meeting of creditors on January 6, 2004.  The order was duly served upon the 
debtor as directed by the order and an affidavit of service filed with the Clerk of this 
court.
3.  The debtor has failed to comply with the order or any part thereof, and has 
failed to provide any explanation as to why he has not complied with the order in any 
respect.  
4.  The history of this matter and the background necessitating the application 
for the December 10, 2003 order was fully presented in the affirmation of Steven 
Sheinwald, dated November 11, 2003, which is on file with this Court.


5.  The debtor, who has already enjoyed the benefits of this bankruptcy filing, in 
addition to three previously dismissed petitions, has utterly failed to perform any 
obligation on his part which he is required to perform, including complying with this 
Court's order.  Inasmuch as the debtor's conduct is an affront to this Court's order and 
authority, and evinces the debtor's bad faith in filing his petition, it is appropriate that 
the debtor be compelled to appear and explain himself to this Court so that this Court 
can fashion appropriate relief, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 105(a) necessary to carry 
out the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
6.  Although dismissal of this case for failing to file schedules and appear at the 
first meeting is certainly one option, I do not believe that this debtor should be 
rewarded in that way, an outcome that the debtor may have anticipated when filing.  
Rather, this debtor appears to have real property which, if liquidated, will produce 
substantial funds for the estate which will ultimately be distributed to the creditors.  
However, the debtor's lack of cooperation has hampered administration of the estate.  
Therefore, in addition to preserving the integrity of the bankruptcy process and 
protecting the rights of the creditors, this debtor's failure to comply with this Court's 
order and to show this Court the respect to which it is entitled, should not go 
unpunished.
7.  Based upon the debtor's actions since the filing of the petition, I have no 
confidence that the debtor will cooperate with me in connection with the marketing and 
sale of the real property.  In fact I spoke to the real estate broker that I engaged to 
market the property and she advised me that she has called the debtor numerous 
times, at least ten telephone conversations, to schedule inspection of the property, and 
the debtor has refused to cooperate.  As such, I would request that the Court direct the 
United States Marshal to take whatever steps are necessary to remove the debtor and 
all of his exempt property from the premises and to secure the premises, thereby 
allowing me and the real estate broker retained by me free access to market the 
property.


8.  Additionally, request is being made for the Court to fix the monthly use and 
occupation expense which will have to be paid by the debtor, effective from the date of 
the filing of the petition through the date he is removed from or vacates the premises.  
As of the date of the filing of the petition the debtor was already behind 31 monthly 
mortgage payments, and 4 more monthly payments have become due since that time.   
 Each monthly mortgage payment is $1,427.73.  Given the debtor's failure to comply 
with this Court's order, his failure to perform his obligations under the Bankruptcy 
Code, his failure to provide cooperation in connection with the marketing of the 
property, and the continuously eroding equity resulting from the debtor's failure to 
tender the required monthly mortgage payments, the debtor should not be permitted to 
continue to reside at the residence rent free.  The creditors of the estate should not be 
penalized because of the debtor's abuse of the bankruptcy process and lack of 
cooperation.  As such I am asking the Court to fix the monthly use and occupation to be 
paid by the debtor effective upon the filing of the petition.  To the extent that the debtor 
does not pay the use and occupation fixed by the Court, request is hereby made to 
deduct the amount not paid from the debtor's homestead exemption.
9.  No prior application for the relief requested herein has been made to this 
Court.
Dated: Garden City, New York  
January 16, 2004	                                                                                                
 
Kenneth Kirschenbaum (KK5082)